top of page

Why Internal Architecture Rating Didn’t Truly Reflect What Was Happening - 10 Reasons


Want to read more?

Subscribe to icmg.in to keep reading this exclusive post.

1,254 views5 comments

5 commentaires


Sunil Dutt Jha
Sunil Dutt Jha
15 mars 2021

All the frameworks only reflect maturity of individuals / groups who have authored the framework

J'aime

Sunil Dutt Jha
Sunil Dutt Jha
15 mars 2021

ICMG Architecture Rating Scale

  • 1 Doubtful ,Questionable ( 0 - 20 %)

  • 2 Incomplete and Inconsistent (20 - 40 %)

  • 3 Good, Possibility to Improve (40 -60 %)

  • 4 Very Good, Verified (60-80 %)

  • 5 Excellence, Proven & Clearly demonstrated (80 - 100 %)

J'aime

Sunil Dutt Jha
Sunil Dutt Jha
13 mars 2021

A new model for rating enterprise projects, digital solutions - part 2 https://www.architecturerating.com/events

https://www.architecturerating.com/events

J'aime

Sunil Dutt Jha
Sunil Dutt Jha
13 mars 2021

A new model for rating enterprise projects, digital solutions - part 1 https://www.architecturerating.com/events


J'aime

Sunil Dutt Jha
Sunil Dutt Jha
13 mars 2021

Our expectations are that Digital System should have

1. life of 6-8 years ( it could be less / more based on certain type of solutions),

2. architecture artifacts must be created which are independent of implementation details, independent of technology (product) environment.

3. clearly separate technology (specifications) with technology (product used in implementation).


A new model for rating enterprise projects, digital solutions - part 1 and part 2 https://www.architecturerating.com/events

J'aime
bottom of page